Douglas Vandergraph

Galatians 4 is one of those chapters that does not shout at you at first. It does not thunder like Galatians 1 with its warning about false gospels, and it does not argue like Galatians 3 with its courtroom-style case for justification by faith. Instead, it speaks the way a father speaks to a child who is about to make a tragic mistake. It reasons. It pleads. It reminds. And then, almost unexpectedly, it breaks down emotionally. Paul stops sounding like a theologian and starts sounding like a wounded parent. This chapter is not just about doctrine. It is about identity. It is about memory. It is about what happens when people who were once free slowly talk themselves back into bondage while convincing themselves they are being faithful.

The tragedy at the heart of Galatians 4 is not that the Galatians were rejecting Christ outright. That would have been easier to confront. The tragedy is that they were adding to Christ in a way that quietly erased Him. They were drifting, not rebelling. They were becoming religious again. And Paul knows something we often miss: you can lose the gospel without ever denying Jesus’ name. You can sing worship songs, quote Scripture, and still live like a spiritual orphan instead of a beloved son.

Paul begins the chapter by using an image that would have been immediately understood in the ancient world. He talks about an heir. A child who is legally entitled to everything, but who, while still young, lives no differently than a servant. The child may own the estate on paper, but in daily life he is under guardians, managers, schedules, and restrictions. He is not free yet, even though freedom is his destiny. This image is not meant to insult the child. It is meant to show the limitation of immaturity. Paul is saying that before Christ, even God’s people lived in a kind of spiritual childhood. They were heirs, but they did not yet live as heirs.

This matters because Paul is about to make a devastating comparison. He says that before Christ, we were enslaved to what he calls the “elementary principles of the world.” These are the basic systems of religion, law, performance, and ritual that govern human attempts to reach God. For Jewish believers, this included the Mosaic Law. For Gentiles, it included pagan religious systems and cultural rules. Different expressions, same bondage. Different vocabulary, same chains. Paul’s point is that religion without Christ always produces the same outcome: control without transformation.

Then Paul makes one of the most beautiful statements in all of Scripture. “When the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son.” This is not a throwaway line. Paul is saying that history was not random. God was not late. God was not reacting. Everything had been moving toward this moment. Empires rose and fell. Roads were built. Languages spread. Legal systems developed. Human longing intensified. And at exactly the right moment, God acted. Not by sending a new law. Not by sending a new prophet. But by sending His Son.

And notice how Paul describes this Son. Born of a woman. Born under the law. Fully human. Fully embedded in the same system that enslaved everyone else. Jesus did not hover above our condition. He entered it. He lived under the weight of the law, not to reinforce it, but to redeem those who were trapped beneath it. The purpose of this redemption is crucial: “so that we might receive adoption as sons.” Not probation. Not apprenticeship. Adoption.

Adoption is one of the most radical metaphors in the New Testament. It does not mean God tolerates us. It means God chooses us. Adoption is not based on the child’s merit. It is based on the parent’s will. Paul is saying that in Christ, God did not just forgive you; He claimed you. He did not just cancel your debt; He gave you a name. And this name changes everything.

Because once you are a son, your relationship to God is no longer transactional. You are not earning affection. You are not negotiating acceptance. You are not performing to avoid rejection. You belong. And because you belong, God sends the Spirit of His Son into our hearts, crying out, “Abba, Father.” This is not formal language. This is intimate language. “Abba” is not a religious title. It is the word a child uses at home. It is the sound of safety. It is the language of trust.

Paul is describing something deeply personal here. Christianity is not just believing certain things about God. It is being brought into a relationship where God becomes your Father, not your employer. Your judge has become your parent. Your ruler has become your protector. And the Spirit inside you does not cry out in fear, but in belonging.

Then Paul delivers the line that should stop every religious heart cold. “So you are no longer a slave, but a son, and if a son, then an heir through God.” No longer a slave. That means whatever system once defined you no longer has authority over you. No longer a slave to sin. No longer a slave to law. No longer a slave to fear. No longer a slave to performance. You are an heir. Not someday. Now.

And yet, this is where the heartbreak begins. Because Paul immediately asks a question that reveals how fragile this freedom is. He reminds the Galatians that before they knew God, they were enslaved to things that were not gods. Their old pagan life was marked by superstition, fear, and ritual. But now, after knowing God, or rather being known by God, why are they turning back? Why are they returning to weak and worthless principles? Why are they submitting themselves again to slavery?

This question is not rhetorical. It is anguished. Paul is saying, “How did you get here?” You were free. You were alive. You knew God as Father. And now you are measuring your spirituality by days, months, seasons, and years. You are tracking rituals. You are observing religious calendars as if your standing with God depends on it. Paul is not attacking discipline. He is attacking dependence. He is not against spiritual practices. He is against trusting them for righteousness.

This is where Galatians 4 becomes uncomfortably modern. Because we do the same thing. We take good things and turn them into requirements. We take spiritual disciplines and turn them into scorecards. We take obedience and turn it into currency. We start believing that God loves us more on our good days than on our bad ones. We start thinking that our quiet time earns us peace, that our church attendance secures our standing, that our theology protects us from insecurity. And before we realize it, we are living like servants in a house where we were adopted as children.

Paul then shifts from argument to relationship. He says, “Brothers, I entreat you, become as I am, for I also have become as you are.” This is not condescension. This is solidarity. Paul is reminding them that he stepped away from his own religious credentials to stand with them in grace. He is not above them. He is with them. And then he reminds them of their shared history.

He recalls how they first received him. How he came to them in weakness. How his physical condition was a trial to them, yet they did not despise him. They welcomed him as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus Himself. This is deeply personal. Paul is saying, “You didn’t come to Christ through a polished performance. You came through a messy relationship. Through suffering. Through vulnerability. Through grace.”

Then he asks another painful question. “What then has become of your blessedness?” In other words, where did your joy go? Where did that sense of freedom disappear? Where did the gratitude turn into anxiety? Where did the gospel stop feeling like good news and start feeling like pressure?

Paul is not accusing them of immorality here. He is accusing them of losing joy. He even says that they would have torn out their own eyes and given them to him if they could. That is how deep their affection once was. So what changed? Paul answers his own question with heartbreaking clarity. “Have I then become your enemy by telling you the truth?”

This is one of the most relevant questions in the entire New Testament. Truth does not always feel kind in the moment, especially when it threatens the systems we have built to feel safe. The Galatians had embraced teachers who made them feel special by adding requirements. These teachers were zealous for them, but not for good. They wanted to shut them out, to isolate them, so that the Galatians would be zealous for them instead. This is how religious control always works. It creates dependence. It shifts loyalty away from Christ and toward human authority. It replaces freedom with obligation and calls it devotion.

Paul exposes this manipulation without hesitation. He is not impressed by zeal that leads away from Christ. He is not flattered by devotion that comes at the cost of freedom. And then he says something that reveals the depth of his heart. “My little children, for whom I am again in the anguish of childbirth until Christ is formed in you.” This is not metaphorical flair. This is emotional honesty. Paul is saying that he is suffering again for them, because their transformation is not complete. Christ has been introduced to them, but He has not yet been fully formed in them.

This is where Galatians 4 stops being about theology and starts being about formation. Paul’s goal is not that the Galatians would agree with him intellectually. His goal is that Christ would take shape in them. That their instincts would change. That their reflexes would shift. That when fear arises, they would respond as sons, not slaves. That when they fail, they would run to God, not hide from Him. That when they obey, they would do so from love, not fear.

Paul even admits that he wishes he could be present with them, to change his tone, because he is perplexed about them. This is not a man enjoying an argument. This is a shepherd grieving over sheep who are wandering back toward the cliff.

Then Paul introduces one final image, one that is often misunderstood. He turns to the story of Abraham’s two sons, one born of a slave woman and one born of a free woman. One born according to the flesh, the other through promise. Paul is not rewriting history here. He is interpreting it spiritually. The son born through human effort represents life built on performance. The son born through promise represents life built on grace.

The contrast is sharp. The child of the slave is born into bondage, even though he shares Abraham’s DNA. The child of the free woman is born into freedom, because his existence is the result of God’s promise, not human planning. Paul is saying that lineage does not guarantee freedom. Effort does not produce inheritance. Promise does.

This is where we will pause for now, because Galatians 4 does not end quietly. It ends with a declaration that demands a response. And in the second half of this article, we will confront what it means to live as children of promise in a world that constantly invites us back into slavery, often under the disguise of spirituality.

Paul’s use of Hagar and Sarah is not an academic exercise. He is not trying to impress the Galatians with clever biblical interpretation. He is pressing a mirror up to their lives and asking them to look honestly at which story they are living inside. The story of Hagar and Sarah is not just ancient history; it is a recurring pattern in the human heart. It is the tension between trusting God’s promise and trying to secure God’s blessing through effort, control, and religious performance.

Hagar represents the impulse to help God along. Sarah represents the long, uncomfortable wait of faith. Ishmael represents what humans can produce when they take matters into their own hands. Isaac represents what only God can produce when He keeps His word. Paul is saying that these two approaches cannot coexist peacefully. They never have. They never will. One will always persecute the other. Performance always resents promise. Law always feels threatened by grace. Control always feels exposed by freedom.

Paul quotes Scripture directly: “Cast out the slave woman and her son, for the son of the slave woman shall not inherit with the son of the free woman.” This is strong language, and it is meant to be. Paul is not advocating cruelty. He is advocating clarity. He is saying that the system of earning cannot inherit alongside the system of grace. They are incompatible. You cannot build your identity partly on Christ and partly on your own performance. You cannot live as a son on Sundays and as a slave the rest of the week. One story has to go.

And then Paul delivers the conclusion that defines the entire chapter: “So, brothers, we are not children of the slave but of the free woman.” This is not advice. This is identity. This is not something you work toward. This is something you wake up into. Paul is not telling them to become free. He is reminding them that they already are.

This is where Galatians 4 presses hardest on modern believers. Because many of us live like spiritual orphans who happen to know a lot of Bible verses. We believe in grace, but we do not live from it. We believe God is loving, but we brace ourselves every time we fail. We believe we are forgiven, but we keep punishing ourselves long after God has moved on. We believe we are sons and daughters, but we schedule our lives like servants hoping not to disappoint a distant master.

The slavery Paul is addressing is subtle. It does not announce itself as bondage. It presents itself as responsibility, seriousness, and spiritual maturity. It tells us that freedom is dangerous, that grace must be managed, that too much assurance will lead to laziness. And so we hedge. We add conditions. We keep score. We turn the Christian life into a system of internal surveillance where we are both the accused and the judge.

Paul knows where this leads. It leads to fear-driven obedience instead of love-driven transformation. It leads to burnout disguised as devotion. It leads to comparison, envy, pride, and despair. It leads to churches full of people who look faithful on the outside but are exhausted and anxious on the inside. And worst of all, it leads people away from intimacy with God while convincing them they are being faithful.

The heart of Galatians 4 is this question: if God has already made you His child, why are you living like you are still auditioning? If God has already given you His Spirit, why are you still measuring your worth by external markers? If Christ has already fulfilled the law on your behalf, why are you trying to rebuild what He fulfilled?

Paul’s frustration is not theological; it is relational. He is not worried that the Galatians will lose a debate. He is worried they will lose their joy. He is worried they will lose the simplicity of knowing God as Father. He is worried they will trade intimacy for obligation and call it growth.

This is why Galatians 4 matters so deeply for anyone who has been in church for a long time. New believers often live in freedom instinctively. They are grateful. They are amazed. They pray boldly. They assume God is kind. But over time, if we are not careful, we learn new rules that God never gave us. We absorb expectations from religious culture. We confuse maturity with seriousness. We mistake discipline for pressure. And slowly, without realizing it, we start living under guardians again.

Paul’s imagery of childhood is important here. The problem is not that the child has rules. The problem is staying in childhood after maturity has come. The law had a purpose. It restrained. It instructed. It prepared. But once Christ came, the purpose changed. The guardians were no longer needed. The heir had come of age. To return to the guardians is not humility; it is regression.

This is why Paul reacts so strongly. He sees adults choosing to live like minors. He sees heirs choosing to live like servants. He sees sons choosing chains over freedom because chains feel familiar. Slavery at least feels predictable. Freedom requires trust.

And trust is the real issue beneath Galatians 4. Trust that God means what He says. Trust that grace is sufficient. Trust that the Spirit is capable of leading without constant external enforcement. Trust that God is more committed to your transformation than you are. Trust that failure does not revoke adoption. Trust that obedience grows best in the soil of security, not fear.

Paul’s labor language earlier in the chapter now makes sense. He is not just correcting beliefs; he is contending for formation. Christ being “formed” in someone is not about external behavior first. It is about internal orientation. It is about where you run when you fail. It is about what voice you listen to when you are afraid. It is about whether your instinct is to hide or to approach. Slaves hide. Sons approach.

The Spirit crying “Abba, Father” inside us is not decorative theology. It is diagnostic. When pressure hits, what rises up inside you? Fear or trust? Performance or prayer? Self-condemnation or honest confession? These reflexes reveal which story you are living in.

Galatians 4 does not tell us to stop obeying God. It tells us to stop obeying Him like we are afraid He will abandon us. It does not tell us to abandon discipline. It tells us to abandon the lie that discipline earns love. It does not tell us to reject structure. It tells us to reject any structure that replaces relationship.

This chapter also exposes how easily good intentions can become spiritual traps. The Galatians likely thought they were becoming more serious, more obedient, more complete. But seriousness is not the same as maturity. Obedience without assurance produces anxiety, not holiness. Growth that costs intimacy is not growth at all.

Paul’s message cuts through every era because the human heart does not change. We are still tempted to measure ourselves by externals. We still equate effort with worth. We still fear freedom more than bondage sometimes. And religious systems still exploit that fear by offering certainty in exchange for control.

Galatians 4 calls us back to something quieter and deeper. It calls us back to being known by God. Not evaluated. Not managed. Known. Paul says it plainly: “Now that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God.” He corrects himself mid-sentence because the emphasis matters. Our knowledge of God is not the foundation. God’s knowledge of us is. We belong because He chose us, not because we understood Him correctly.

This changes everything. When your identity rests on being known and loved, obedience becomes a response, not a requirement. Repentance becomes safe, not humiliating. Growth becomes organic, not forced. Community becomes supportive, not competitive. And faith becomes restful, not frantic.

Galatians 4 does not end with a list of commands. It ends with a declaration of identity. You are not a child of the slave woman. You are a child of promise. You exist because God spoke, not because you performed. You belong because God adopted, not because you qualified. And nothing exposes the lie of slavery faster than living like that is true.

The question Galatians 4 leaves us with is not “Are you religious enough?” It is “Are you free?” Are you living as someone who knows God as Father? Or are you still trying to earn what has already been given? Are you building your life on promise or performance? Are you trusting the Spirit to lead, or are you retreating to systems that make you feel in control?

Paul’s anguish was not wasted. His words still call out across centuries to believers who have forgotten who they are. Galatians 4 is an invitation to stop managing your faith and start living it. To stop negotiating with God and start trusting Him. To stop returning to chains that Christ already broke.

Because the quiet tragedy is not rebellion. It is regression. It is forgetting that you were free and choosing slavery because it feels safer. Galatians 4 exists to remind you that safety was never the goal. Sonship was.

And once you know you are a son, everything changes.

Watch Douglas Vandergraph’s inspiring faith-based videos on YouTube

Support the ministry by buying Douglas a coffee

Your friend,
Douglas Vandergraph

#Galatians #ChristianFaith #FreedomInChrist #GraceOverLaw #BibleReflection #SpiritualGrowth #FaithJourney