GoldenEraIntel

On January 29, 2025, President Donald Trump signed the Laken Riley Act, a law that expands state power by allowing state attorneys general to sue the federal government for inadequate enforcement of immigration laws. At first glance, this looks like a simple policy move, but beneath the surface, it could reshape the balance of power between states and Washington D.C.

This isn’t just about immigration. This is about money, power, and who really controls federal spending.

What Does the Laken Riley Act Actually Do? The Act gives state attorneys general the right to:

• Sue the federal government if they believe lax immigration enforcement has financially harmed their state.
• Claim damages with no set cap, meaning potential lawsuits could reach billions.
• Turn state-level lawsuits into federal budget drains, shifting economic power from Congress to the courts.

This means states can effectively penalize the federal government for immigration policies they don’t agree with.

Unintended Consequence: Could states start suing over other federal policies—education, healthcare, environmental laws—setting a precedent that Congress never intended?

Who Really Wins Here?

The Laken Riley Act benefits:

• State Governments: They can demand payouts and redirect federal funds into their own budgets.
• The Courts: Judges—not Congress—could start deciding where federal money goes.
• Anti-Immigration Hardliners: This gives states a legal weapon against federal immigration policy.

But there’s a bigger issue: What happens when multiple states sue at the same time?

The Financial Fallout: Could This Drain Federal Discretionary Spending? There’s no cap on damages states can claim under this Act. That means:

• If enough states file lawsuits, federal discretionary spending could collapse.
• The federal government may be forced to cut funding elsewhere to pay settlements.
• Congress could lose control over the national budget—because lawsuits, not lawmakers, would be allocating funds.

Imagine this scenario:

• Texas sues for $2B.
• Florida sues for $5B.
• Arizona joins in for another $3B.

Other states follow suit. Where does that money come from? And who decides what gets cut?

What’s the Endgame?

The Laken Riley Act could:

• Set a new precedent for states challenging federal authority.
• Open the door for similar lawsuits in other policy areas.
• Lead to Congress stepping in to cap damages or limit lawsuits altogether.

Final Question: If states can bankrupt federal programs through lawsuits, does Congress even control the budget anymore? In other words, if lawsuits control spending, what happens to democracy?

🍺 Enjoying the insights?
Buy me a beer & keep the intel flowing: 🍻 Buy Me a Beer.