8 Questions That You May Not Have Considered Asking Yourself
Article also available at https://medium.com/@non-monetized_together/8-questions-that-you-may-not-have-considered-asking-yourself-133d0ff85061?source=friends_link&sk=09755cedbad4d4f7134088e6b7ede56e.
Nonmonetized Together is a place where people can think ponder their worldview and develop a greater understanding of themselves. This article is no different.
I’ve put together eight questions for readers to ask themselves. Probably only some of the questions will apply to each reader. There are three positive outcomes that this can achieve:
a) You teach me that a question is inaccurate or missing key information.
b) You keep the previous belief that the question is asking about, but expand it so that it now accounts for the factors mentioned in the question. This would result in a more educated and persuasive argument than what you had before.
c) You change your mind after considering the question.
There is one not-so-positive outcome this article can achieve, and that would be if you already considered the points I bring up, therefore waste their time by reading the article. I welcome all four options equally because I gave up on having political views a while ago. I’m here to provide an online environment where you can be encouraged to encounter any of the four outcomes.
Okay, here are the questions:
1. Have you considered that by framing abortion as a women’s issue and not a family issue, you’re describing childcare choices as something only women can do?
2. Why would you assume all affirmative action hires people based off their identity and not their suitability for the job? Maybe some affirmative action initiatives can focus on the most suitable applicants from each race, gender, sexuality, and disability.
3. If you made a big fuss about YouTube dislikes getting removed but not about YouTube removing comments from videos on “Topic” channels, why?
4. Why are you so concerned about “cancel culture” when back in the day, you would understand that you can’t please everybody? (This might be a good question for @lanajthomas)
5. You do realize that shutting down sexuality-switching sessions only helps those who are fine with their current sexuality, right? Not people who want to change it.
6. When somebody calls your theory racist, why do you choose to take it personally instead of as feedback on the weaknesses of your theory?
7. Why do you expect AI to compensate you for influencing its output when human artists don’t compensate you for influencing them?
8. What makes you think that you can convince people with harmful ideologies to change their mind if you don’t even let them speak on your platform?
I hope you had fun expanding your perspectives! And before you comment, remember, this is a #svalien space, which means you are free to not let your political orientation limit your ability to do things such as supporting your side’s sacrificial lambs, not forcing everybody into predefined groups, and more. Read here to find out.