So Western trad men say masculinity is accepting your innate aggression, and Asian trad men say masculinity is giving parents your monthly salary. I don't know which one is correct.
And funny they mentioned that girls can just be naturally harmonic when dealing with conflicts. Because when I was 15, my biggest demon wasn’t math, but that I had to control myself not to use violence.
The typical girls, then, believe that it is actual science, proceed to hide their aggression by pretending they are totally lovely (reaction information). The passive aggression and hidden sadism, then, replace the obvious violence, further confirms the gender aggression theory. But now they add another “fact” to complete the theory, that “girls are manipulative”.
By their logic, gifted schools would be full of low-testosterone boys running around the campus because they never fight. No. In that environment, both girls and boys know reputation matters. To have an academic future and white collar jobs, they can't act on their aggression, even if they are boys. Instead, boys would just be as passive-aggressive like every other girls because it's more convenient.