On shame and polarization
I am a firm believer that only love can overcome hate. I think stuff like right-wing vs left-wing is a great example of this. I don’t know how anyone expects the other group to communicate if they are both constantly villanizing each other. But I’m also saying this because I was in the wrong today. I realized I did something bad; the worst part was that I didn’t understand why it was bad mentally. Since I know myself relatively well, I feel confident saying that I don’t have any ill intentions – but rather the mistake I made was a shortcoming that I think a lot of men particularly fall victim to. Since I’m talking in vague terms I can’t exactly go more into depth on that part of it, but I ended up applying some REBT techniques and did some research to bridge the gap between my actions and intentions.
I think that most people won’t do stuff like this – and I realized that a lot of things seem obvious to people when it upsets them, but we always forget what it’s like to not know something. In an ideal world, everyone would learn healthy communication and comfortably help each other grow, but instead in practice, I think that there’s always the fear of someone judging you and ruining your perception.
In an extreme example – which is worse. Imagine if your friend was a straight-up neonazi. Or at least they made a joke or comment that aligns with that. Which would you think better of? The person who just immediately apologizes, or the person who apologizes and then asks several follow-up questions to understand why it’s bad. I think most people would prefer the former, as it gives the benefit of the doubt to a miscommunication. But in both situations, they’re the same person: just one person doesn’t end up changing their beliefs and rather just adapts their behavior in certain situations, namely interacting with you. I think it’s best for everyone if the second case happens, where you genuinely talk in a non-aggressive way about why certain things are problems. But at the same time, if people don’t see things the way I do, the hypothetical neonazi is incentivized to not change their behavior in order to not damage their relationship. Isn’t that a weird, counterintuitive result?
Or who knows, maybe I’m just rambling. God knows if what I type is even coherent, it’s 3 am in the morning and I’m covered in brain fog.